
AbstractWhile direct homogenisation approaches such as the FE method are subject to the assumption of scale separation, the mesh‐in‐element (MIEL) approach is based on an approach with strong scale coupling, which is based on a discretization with finite elements. In this contribution we propose a two‐scale MIEL scheme in the framework of the theory of porous media (TPM). This work is a further development of the MIEL method which is based on the works of the authors A. Ibrahimbegovic, R.L. Taylor, D. Markovic, H.G. Matthies, R. Niekamp (in alphabetical order); where we find the physical and mathematical as well as the software coupling implementation aspects of the multi‐scale modeling of heterogeneous structures with inelastic constitutive behaviour, see for example, [Eng Comput, 2005;22(5‐6):664‐683.] and [Eng Comput, 2009;26(1/2):6‐28.]. Within the scope of this contribution, the necessary theoretical foundations of TPM are provided and the special features of the algorithmic implementation in the context of the MIEL method are worked out. Their fusion is investigated in representative numerical examples to evaluate the characteristics of this approach and to determine its range of application.
scale transition matrix, microscopic/macroscopic problem, Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, finite element discretization, homogenization, 530, Fluid-solid interactions (including aero- and hydro-elasticity, porosity, etc.), 620, Maschinenbau, heterogeneous consolidation, binary model, pile wall, Homogenization and oscillations in dynamical problems of solid mechanics
scale transition matrix, microscopic/macroscopic problem, Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, finite element discretization, homogenization, 530, Fluid-solid interactions (including aero- and hydro-elasticity, porosity, etc.), 620, Maschinenbau, heterogeneous consolidation, binary model, pile wall, Homogenization and oscillations in dynamical problems of solid mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
