
doi: 10.1002/nme.102
AbstractThe generalized differential quadrature rule (GDQR) proposed here is aimed at solving high‐order differential equations. The improved approach is completely exempted from the use of the existing δ‐point technique by applying multiple conditions in a rigorous manner. The GDQR is used here to static and dynamic analyses of Bernoulli–Euler beams and classical rectangular plates. Numerical error analysis caused by the method itself is carried out in the beam analysis. Independent variables for the plate are first defined. The explicit weighting coefficients are derived for a fourth‐order differential equation with two conditions at two different points. It is quite evident that the GDQR expressions and weighting coefficients for two‐dimensional problems are not a direct application of those for one‐dimensional problems. The GDQR are implemented through a number of examples. Good results are obtained in this work. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bemouli-Euler beam, fourth-order differential equations, Fourth-order differential equation, Numerical method, Other numerical methods in solid mechanics, Polynomial, 510, generalized differential quadrature rule, Vibrations in dynamical problems in solid mechanics, Bernoulli-Euler beams, Differential quadrature method, Rectangular plate, Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.), Plates, rectangular plates, error analysis
Bemouli-Euler beam, fourth-order differential equations, Fourth-order differential equation, Numerical method, Other numerical methods in solid mechanics, Polynomial, 510, generalized differential quadrature rule, Vibrations in dynamical problems in solid mechanics, Bernoulli-Euler beams, Differential quadrature method, Rectangular plate, Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.), Plates, rectangular plates, error analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 97 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
