
AbstractStarting from six kinds of periodicity of words we define six sets of words which are primitive in different senses and we investigate their relationships. We show that only three of the sets are external Marcus contextual languages with choice but none of them is an external contextual language without choice or an internal contextual language. For the time complexity of deciding any of our sets by one‐tape Turing machines, n 2 is a lower bound and this is optimal in two cases. The notions of roots and degrees of words and languages, which are strongly connected to periodicity and primitivity, are also considered, and we show that there can be an arbitrarily large gap between the complexity of a language and that of its roots. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
primitivity of words, Marcus contextual languages, Combinatorics on words, computational complexity of languages, roots of words and languages, Formal languages and automata, periodicity of words
primitivity of words, Marcus contextual languages, Combinatorics on words, computational complexity of languages, roots of words and languages, Formal languages and automata, periodicity of words
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
