
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4623
pmid: 21919003
AbstractBACKGROUND: In Romania, the Alveograph is the most used device to evaluate the rheological properties of wheat flour dough, but lately the Mixolab device has begun to play an important role in the breadmaking industry. These two instruments are based on different principles but there are some correlations that can be found between the parameters determined by the Mixolab and the rheological properties of wheat dough measured with the Alveograph.RESULTS: Statistical analysis on 80 wheat flour samples using the backward stepwise multiple regression method showed that Mixolab values using the ‘Chopin S’ protocol (40 samples) and ‘Chopin + ’ protocol (40 samples) can be used to elaborate predictive models for estimating the value of the rheological properties of wheat dough: baking strength (W), dough tenacity (P) and extensibility (L). The correlation analysis confirmed significant findings (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01) between the parameters of wheat dough studied by the Mixolab and its rheological properties measured with the Alveograph.CONCLUSION: A number of six predictive linear equations were obtained. Linear regression models gave multiple regression coefficients with $R_{\rm {adjusted}}^{2} > 0.70$ for P, $R_{\rm {adjusted}}^{2} > 0.70$ for W and $R_{\rm {adjusted}}^{2} > 0.38$ for L, at a 95% confidence interval. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry
Chemical Phenomena, Glutens, Food Handling, Protein Stability, Romania, Flour, Reproducibility of Results, Water, Bread, Food Inspection, Absorption, Physicochemical, Models, Chemical, Food Quality, Linear Models, Cooking, Rheology, Mechanical Phenomena
Chemical Phenomena, Glutens, Food Handling, Protein Stability, Romania, Flour, Reproducibility of Results, Water, Bread, Food Inspection, Absorption, Physicochemical, Models, Chemical, Food Quality, Linear Models, Cooking, Rheology, Mechanical Phenomena
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
