
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3011
AbstractBACKGROUND: The interactions between phenolic compounds and proteins can modify protein properties important in the food industry. To understand the effects of these interactions, the covalent interactions between caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid, CQA) oxidised by polyphenol oxidase (PPO) at acidic pH 6 (pH 6) and α‐lactalbumin, lysozyme and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were compared with non‐enzymatically induced covalent interactions at alkaline pH (pH 9). The effects of these modifications on protein properties were examined.RESULTS: Both ways of modification seemed to result in protein modification mainly via dimeric rather than monomeric CQA quinones. These modifications led to a decrease in the number of free primary amino groups of the proteins. Modification with CQA alone induced a low degree of protein dimerisation, which also occurred through the action of PPO alone. Modification drastically reduced the solubility of lysozyme over a broad pH range, whereas that of α‐lactalbumin was strongly reduced only at pH values close to its pI. The solubility of BSA was much less affected than that of the other proteins and only at acidic pH.CONCLUSION: These results indicate some similarities between modifications at pH 6 and 9 and that both modifications clearly change the functional properties of globular proteins. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
physicochemical characterization, proteolytic digestion, bovine serum-albumin, derivatives, systems, peroxidase, model solutions, caffeic acid, polyphenol oxidase, tyrosine
physicochemical characterization, proteolytic digestion, bovine serum-albumin, derivatives, systems, peroxidase, model solutions, caffeic acid, polyphenol oxidase, tyrosine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 151 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
