
AbstractTwelve varieties of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), 14 varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoideum), 12 varieties of setaria (Setaria italica), four varieties of ragi (Eleucine coracana), 11 varieties of echinocloa millet (Echinocloa colona), 13 varieties of proso (Panicium miliaceum), 11 varieties of kodo (Paspalum scorbiculatum) and 11 varieties of miliare (Panicium miliare) were screened for inhibitory activity against human salivary amylase. Echinocloa, proso, kodo and miliare had no detectable activity. Two strains of sorghum and one strain of pearl millet did not show α‐amylase inhibitory activity. All other seeds had activity, the highest being observed in sorghum. Setaria had no action on human, bovine and porcine pancreatic anylases. Sorghum inhibitor did not act on bovine and porcine pancreatic amylases. Pearl millet and ragi extracts inhibited all the four α‐amylases. The inhibitors were non‐dialysable and were inactivated by pepsin treatment. Setaria and sorghum inhibitors were relatively thermolabile compared to ragi and pearl millet inhibitors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
