
SummaryIn the conceptualization of thriving at work, it is emphasized that employees' learning and vitality are two equally important components of thriving and that thriving is facilitated by contextual features and available resources. In this study, we examined the effects of two challenge stressors (time pressure and learning demands) on thriving at work. Based on the literature on challenge and hindrance stressors, we proposed that challenge stressors positively affect learning and negatively affect vitality. To uncover underlying mechanisms, we measured challenge appraisal and hindrance appraisal of work situations in a diary study. A sample of 124 knowledge workers responded to three daily surveys (before the lunch break, during the afternoon, and at the end of the workday) for a period of five workdays. Results indicate that the indirect effects of learning demands and time pressure on learning are mediated by challenge appraisal, whereas indirect effects of learning demands on vitality are mediated by hindrance appraisal. Overall, our study shows that challenge stressors have a positive total effect on learning but no total effect on vitality. These differential relationships call for a finer distinction between the two components of thriving at work in future research. Copyright © 2016 The Authors Journal of Organizational Behavior Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
time pressure, MEDIATION, 501002 Angewandte Psychologie, ATTRIBUTIONS, CREATIVITY, PSYCHOLOGY, 501002 Applied psychology, diary study, HINDRANCE, Research Articles, INTERNAL CONSISTENCY, 501003 Occupational psychology, learning demands, thriving, ENGAGEMENT, PERFORMANCE, 501003 Arbeitspsychologie, EMOTIONS, JOB DEMANDS, cognitive appraisal
time pressure, MEDIATION, 501002 Angewandte Psychologie, ATTRIBUTIONS, CREATIVITY, PSYCHOLOGY, 501002 Applied psychology, diary study, HINDRANCE, Research Articles, INTERNAL CONSISTENCY, 501003 Occupational psychology, learning demands, thriving, ENGAGEMENT, PERFORMANCE, 501003 Arbeitspsychologie, EMOTIONS, JOB DEMANDS, cognitive appraisal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 291 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
