
doi: 10.1002/hpja.166
pmid: 29667713
AbstractIssues addressedAgriculture is recognised as a highly dangerous sector worldwide; hence, the use of evidence‐based solutions to address injury‐related incidents is critical to prevention. The main of this article was to determine the potential for prevention by use of existing controls based on deaths data from 2001‐2016.MethodsThis study assesses data from the National Coroner's Information System for the period 2001‐2016 in regard to unintentional farm injury deaths in Australia (n = 1271). The six leading causes of death (tractors, quads [ATVs], water/dams, farm utilities [pickups], motorcycles and horses: n = 644) are reviewed against existing evidence‐based practice recommendations to ascertain the potential capacity to prevent and/or ameliorate the severity of the fatal incidents. Projections of economic costs associated with these incidents in the past five years (2012‐2016) are outlined.ResultsOf the cases involving the six leading agents (n = 644), 36% (n = 235) have the potential to be prevented with the use of designated evidence‐based controls. Meanwhile, the costs attributed to deaths involving the six leading agents in the 2012‐2016 period, exceeded $313 million.ConclusionsFarm injury incidents and their related economic costs can be reduced by enhanced adoption of the existing evidence‐based controls.So whatFarm safety efforts in Australia require reinvigoration and funding to focus on evidence‐based controls supported by enforcement to attain maximum impact.
Farms, Australia, Animals, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Agriculture, Horses
Farms, Australia, Animals, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Agriculture, Horses
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
