
pmid: 38747535
AbstractObjectivesTo examine the factors associated with institutionalization among individuals aged 80 years and over in Germany (total sample and stratified by sex).Methods/DesignWe used data from the nationally representative ‘Old Age in Germany (D80+)’ (analytic sample: n = 9572 individuals), including individuals aged 80 years and over in Germany. Institutionalization (private living vs. institutionalization) served as an outcome measure. For the written interview, data collection took place from November 2020 to April 2021. Multiple logistic regressions of the overall sample (also stratified by sex) were applied.ResultsIn the analytic sample, 10.2% (95% CI: 9.2%–11.3%) of the participants were institutionalized. The odds of being institutionalized were positively associated with being female (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.80), being 90 years and over (compared to 80–84 years, OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.40), not being married (e.g., being single compared to being married: OR: 14.06, 95% CI: 6.73 to 29.37), higher education (e.g., high education compared to low education: OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.84), more favorable self‐rated health (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.62) and greater functional impairment (OR: 15.34, 95% CI: 11.91 to 19.74). Sex‐stratified regressions were also conducted, mostly yielding similar results.ConclusionOur study highlighted the role of several sociodemographic factors (particularly marital status, e.g., being single) and functional impairment for the risk of institutionalization among the oldest old in Germany. This study confirms findings in studies in younger samples that functional decline is the main factor associated with institutionalization. As functional decline may be modifiable, efforts to maintain functional abilities may be important. This knowledge is important for relevant groups (such as clinicians and policy‐makers) because it may guide early intervention and prevention efforts, can help allocate healthcare resources effectively and shape policies to support independent living. Further insights using longitudinal data is recommended.
Male, Epidemiology and Implications of Multimorbidity in Healthcare, Aging, Institutionalisation, Epidemiology, Population, Social Sciences, Logistic regression, Sex Factors, Sociology, Risk Factors, Germany, Health Sciences, Pathology, Humans, Psychology, Marital status, Influence of Aging on Emotional Experience and Well-being, Internal medicine, Demography, Aged, 80 and over, Psychiatry, Confidence interval, Stratified sampling, Institutionalization, Odds ratio, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Psychology, Logistic Models, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health, Medicine, Female, D80+; Chronisch krank; Hochbetagte; Heimbewohner; Sozioökonomischer Status; Bildung; Funktionsverlust; Self-rated health; Verheiratet; Familienstand, Impact of Social Factors on Health Outcomes, Gerontology
Male, Epidemiology and Implications of Multimorbidity in Healthcare, Aging, Institutionalisation, Epidemiology, Population, Social Sciences, Logistic regression, Sex Factors, Sociology, Risk Factors, Germany, Health Sciences, Pathology, Humans, Psychology, Marital status, Influence of Aging on Emotional Experience and Well-being, Internal medicine, Demography, Aged, 80 and over, Psychiatry, Confidence interval, Stratified sampling, Institutionalization, Odds ratio, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Psychology, Logistic Models, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health, Medicine, Female, D80+; Chronisch krank; Hochbetagte; Heimbewohner; Sozioökonomischer Status; Bildung; Funktionsverlust; Self-rated health; Verheiratet; Familienstand, Impact of Social Factors on Health Outcomes, Gerontology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
