
arXiv: 2004.13984
AbstractFor most finite element simulations, boundary‐conforming meshes have significant advantages in terms of accuracy or efficiency. This is particularly true for complex domains. However, with increased complexity of the domain, generating a boundary‐conforming mesh becomes more difficult and time consuming. One might therefore decide to resort to an approach where individual boundary‐conforming meshes are pieced together in a modular fashion to form a larger domain. This article presents a stabilized finite element formulation for fluid and temperature equations on sliding meshes. It couples the solution fields of multiple subdomains whose boundaries slide along each other on common interfaces. Thus, the method allows to use highly tuned boundary‐conforming meshes for each subdomain that are only coupled at the overlapping boundary interfaces. In contrast to standard overlapping or fictitious domain methods the coupling is broken down to few interfaces with reduced geometric dimension. The formulation consists of the following key ingredients: the coupling of the solution fields on the overlapping surfaces is imposed weakly using a stabilized version of Nitsche's method. It ensures mass and energy conservation at the common interfaces. Additionally, we allow to impose weak Dirichlet boundary conditions at the nonoverlapping parts of the interfaces. We present a detailed numerical study for the resulting stabilized formulation. It shows optimal convergence behavior of the interface coupling for both Newtonian and generalized Newtonian material models. Simulations of flow of plastic melt inside single‐screw as well as twin‐screw extruders demonstrate the applicability of the method to complex and relevant industrial applications.
FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/510, 510
FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/510, 510
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
