Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 1822/69546
Increasing mobility, sensing, and interconnection needs is driving the need for low cost and environmental friendly energy storage systems, and therefore, printed batteries represent one of the most appealing solutions. To identify materials‐processing conditions–performance relationships to design improved screen‐printed batteries, the effects of the ink preparation method and the chemical structure of the polymer binder on batteries performance are studied. Screen‐printed cathodes with “green” solvent cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) are produced using different styrene‐block‐copolymers (SBC) with different ethylene/butylene ratios and using three dispersion methods of the cathode components. It is shown that a limited amount of ethylene in the copolymer binder enhances the discharge capacity for 5C and C/5 rates (105 and 142 mAh g−1, respectively). The ink preparation methods affect cathode performance in a larger extent than the chemical structure of the binder. The sequential addition of active and conductive materials to the styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene solution results in a higher cathode charge/discharge capacity compared with the other explored dispersion methods (150/147 mAh g−1 for charge/discharge capacity). The optimized cathode performance is related with the improved degree of dispersion of the cathode components, as assessed by rheological properties of inks and by the morphological characterization of the printed cathodes.
printed lithium-ion batteries, styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene, dispersion methods, styrene-butadiene-styrene, cathodes
printed lithium-ion batteries, styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene, dispersion methods, styrene-butadiene-styrene, cathodes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts