
AbstractA meta‐analysis of 76 studies (N = 31,016) examined the relationship between social identification and depression. Overall, individuals who identify highly with a group tend to report less depression (average rz = −.15). However, a large amount of variability between studies was observed. The 95% prediction interval, which indicates the true effect size that can be expected in future research, ranged from rz = −.50 to .19. The relationship between depression and social identification is more complex than previously assumed. Some variability is related to the social identification measure used. Studies that focused on identification with interactive groups (rz = −.28) had larger effect sizes than studies that focused on social categories (rz = −.11). Moreover, studies of non‐stigmatized groups (rz = −.24) had larger effect sizes than studies of stigmatized groups (rz = −.10). In conclusion, the structure and social identity content of groups appear to play an important role in the relationship between depression and social identification.
COGNITIVE HEALTH, PUBLICATION BIAS, STRESS, DISCRIMINATION, COLLECTIVE SELF-ESTEEM, ANXIETY, INVENTORY, ETHNIC-IDENTITY, IN-GROUP IDENTIFICATION, MENTAL-ILLNESS
COGNITIVE HEALTH, PUBLICATION BIAS, STRESS, DISCRIMINATION, COLLECTIVE SELF-ESTEEM, ANXIETY, INVENTORY, ETHNIC-IDENTITY, IN-GROUP IDENTIFICATION, MENTAL-ILLNESS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 88 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
