Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Aqueous enzymatic extraction and demulsification of camellia seed oil (Camellia oleifera Abel.) and the oil's physicochemical properties

Authors: Xuezhi Fang; Xueqian Fei; Hong Sun; Yongfeng Jin;

Aqueous enzymatic extraction and demulsification of camellia seed oil (Camellia oleifera Abel.) and the oil's physicochemical properties

Abstract

An aqueous enzymatic extraction method was developed to extract oil from camellia seed (Camellia oleifera Abel.). Individual enzymes and combinations of enzymes, pH, the ratio of material to water, reaction time and methods of demulsification were studied. The effects of hexane and aqueous enzymatic extraction on the oil's physicochemical properties (acid value, peroxide value, fatty acid profile, phenolics, and phospholipids content) were compared. The combination of protease/cellulase yielded significantly more oil than did other combinations. Under the optimal reaction conditions, a free oil yield of 82.37% was obtained. Four types of demulsification methods were compared. After demulsification with 20% ethanol (v/v), the highest total free oil yield of 91.38% was achieved. Compared with hexane‐extracted oil, aqueous enzymatic‐extracted oil was more acidic; had a higher percentage of monounsaturated fatty acid and contents of vitamin E and squalene; and had lower peroxide values, percentage of total saturated fatty acid, polyunsaturated acid, and content of both total phenolics and total phospholipids.Practical applications: The current work will contribute to an efficient enzymatic extraction method for camellia seed oil and help with the develop a method to demulsify the emulsion.An aqueous enzymatic extraction method was developed to extract oil from camellia seed (Camellia oleifera Abel.). Individual enzymes and combinations of enzymes, pH, the ratio of material to water, reaction time and methods of demulsification were studied. The effects of hexane and aqueous enzymatic extraction on the oil's physicochemical properties (acid value, peroxide value, fatty acid profile, phenolics, and phospholipids content) were compared. The combination of protease/cellulase yielded significantly more oil than did other combinations. Under the optimal reaction conditions, a free oil yield of 82.37% was obtained. Four types of demulsification methods were compared. After demulsification with 20% ethanol (v/v), the highest total free oil yield of 91.38% was achieved. Compared with hexane‐extracted oil, aqueous enzymatic‐extracted oil was more acidic; had a higher percentage of monounsaturated fatty acid and contents of vitamin E and squalene; and had lower peroxide values, percentage of total saturated fatty acid, polyunsaturated acid, and content of both total phenolics and total phospholipids.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    67
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
67
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!