Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Crop Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Crop Science
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Crop Science
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Comparison among nine alfalfa breeding schemes based on actual biomass yield gains

Authors: Paolo Annicchiarico; Luciano Pecetti;

Comparison among nine alfalfa breeding schemes based on actual biomass yield gains

Abstract

AbstractThe definition of efficient selection methods for biomass yield of alfalfa and other open‐pollinated forage crops has lagged behind, despite its crucial importance for breeders. This study, performed in northern Italy, aimed to compare nine breeding schemes encompassing the evaluation of replicated clones and half‐sib (HS), first selfing generation (S1) or second selfing generation (S2) families without or with within‐family selection. The comparison was based on actual gains for dry‐matter yield over 43 mo and final plant survival across irrigated and rainfed cropping of advanced generation synthetics (Syn‐3) built from 12 selected parents. The study envisaged biomass yield selection over 31 mo under dense planting among 125 S0 plants and/or their progenies, after a stage of stratified mass selection which acted as a benchmark for genetic gains and whose genetic progress over the original genetic base was concurrently assessed. Half‐sib progeny‐based selection exhibited highest genetic gains with respect to unit time and return on yearly investment for direct costs for both biomass yield and crop persistence. Among‐and‐within‐HS family selection ranked second, and S1 progeny‐based selection ranked third, for yield gains, whereas three schemes implying two selfing generations were valuable for improving persistence but not yield. The initial stage of stratified mass selection was time‐ and cost‐efficient for improving yield but not persistence. We provided information also on self‐fertility and inbreeding depression variation across selfing generations, genetic variation of clonal, HS, S1 and S2 material, and consistency of S0 parent value across different types of material. Our results may have implications for field‐based and genomic selection.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
hybrid