Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Crop Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Crop Science
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Rhizoma peanut herbage and root–rhizome responses to extended regrowth periods

Authors: Katie D. Cooley; Lynn E. Sollenberger; Marta M. Kohmann; Ann S. Blount; Jose C.B. Dubeux; Maria L. Silveira; Liliane S. da Silva; +1 Authors

Rhizoma peanut herbage and root–rhizome responses to extended regrowth periods

Abstract

AbstractRhizoma peanut (RP; Arachis glabrata Benth.) is an important species for hay production in the U.S. Gulf Coast region; however, frequent summer rains and high humidity often preclude optimal harvest intervals. Extended regrowth periods are common on‐farm but data are limited assessing their impact on plant responses. The objective was to compare above‐ and belowground responses of 14 RP entries to defoliation frequency during 3 yr. Frequencies were one (1×) and two (2×) harvests per year, reflecting common producer practice. Annual herbage accumulation (HA) was approximately twice as great for 2× than 1× (10.5 vs. 5.4 Mg ha−1 yr−1, respectively). An exception was experimental line Beta for which HA did not differ between frequencies, perhaps because of Beta's greater disease tolerance that minimized leaf shedding. The 2× frequency also had greater herbage crude protein concentration than 1× (150 and 125 g kg−1, respectively). Reductions in HA and nutritive value for 1× vs. 2× were generally greatest for upright‐growing entries. Plots cut once per year had 54% more root–rhizome mass than those cut twice (8.5 vs 5.5 Mg ha−1, respectively) but defoliation frequency did not affect root–rhizome total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) concentration. Results indicated RP hay producers should harvest both summer and fall (2×) at minimum. If rhizomes are to be dug for subsequent vegetative propagation, defoliation should be limited to once annually to avoid reduction in root–rhizome mass.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!