
handle: 10356/142581
AbstractWe report the possibility of recycling carbonaceous materials (GC) from used/spent Li‐ion batteries (LIBs) and re‐using the material again as a negative electrode. In addition to LIB, the possibility of using them in Li‐ion capacitor (LIC) configuration with activated carbon is also explored. First, the carbonaceous materials are recovered from the mechanical treatment and subsequent leaching process. After the successful recovery, the Li‐insertion properties are studied in half‐cell assembly and it exhibits very decent electrochemical activity. While re‐using GC as an anode, large irreversibility is noted compared to fresh usage. Therefore, the elimination of such irreversible capacity is desperately required prior to the fabrication of either LIBs or LICs. Full‐cell LIB is assembled with olivine phase LiFePO4 cathode and the configuration delivers a maximum energy density of ∼313 Wh kg−1. Similarly, the GC is used as an anode in LIC assembly with commercial activated carbon. The LIC displays an energy density of ∼112 Wh kg−1 with decent cycling profiles.
Engineering::Materials::Energy materials, 600, Lithium-ion Battery, Science::Chemistry, Anode
Engineering::Materials::Energy materials, 600, Lithium-ion Battery, Science::Chemistry, Anode
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
