
doi: 10.1002/cche.10303
handle: 2434/746003 , 20.500.12390/2530
AbstractBackground and objectiveAndean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) has health benefits with promising possibilities for food industry. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of processing (water debittering, extrusion, and spray‐drying) on chemical composition, heat damage and in vitro protein digestibility in Andean lupin.FindingsThe processing treatment modified all the parameters while the genotype showed limited effect. The untreated lupins had high protein and lipid content (47.4 and 16.2 g/100 g dry matter). The extruded products showed higher protein content (55.7 g/100 g) and digestibility (68.1%) than the untreated lupins, along with limited heat damage (8.7 mg furosine/100 g protein). Spray‐drying led to the lowest protein content (31.8 g/100 g) and, when maltodextrin was used, the highest heat damage (54.1 ± 20.7 mg furosine/100 g protein; 0.60 mg hydroxymethylfurfural/kg; 0.58 mg glycosylisomaltol/kg), but also to the maximum protein digestibility (72.8%–74.0%).ConclusionsThe chemical composition of Andean lupin was improved by the technological treatments (debittering, extrusion, and spray‐drying) applied. Processing enhanced nutritional value and digestibility, without inducing relevant heat damage.Significance and noveltyExtrusion and spray‐drying improve the in vitro protein digestibility of Andean lupin flour causing limited heat damage.
extrusion, heat damage, http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.04.01, debittering; extrusion; heat damage; Lupinus mutabilis; spray-drying, debittering, Lupinus mutabilis, spray-drying
extrusion, heat damage, http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.04.01, debittering; extrusion; heat damage; Lupinus mutabilis; spray-drying, debittering, Lupinus mutabilis, spray-drying
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
