
doi: 10.1002/cad.20359
pmid: 32960503
Although developmental science has always been evolving, these times of fast-paced and profound social and scientific changes easily lead to disorienting fragmentation rather than coherent scientific advances. What directions should developmental science pursue to meaningfully address real-world problems that impact human development throughout the lifespan? What conceptual or policy shifts are needed to steer the field in these directions? The present manifesto is proposed by a group of scholars from various disciplines and perspectives within developmental science to spark conversations and action plans in response to these questions. After highlighting four critical content domains that merit concentrated and often urgent research efforts, two issues regarding "how" we do developmental science and "what for" are outlined. This manifesto concludes with five proposals, calling for integrative, inclusive, transdisciplinary, transparent, and actionable developmental science. Specific recommendations, prospects, pitfalls, and challenges to reach this goal are discussed.
applicability, developmental science, 150, Psychology, Developmental, 501, Biobehavioral Sciences, 03 Good health and well-being, Psicología, Psicologia - Investigaciones, 004, applicability; developmental science; diversity; globalization; reproducibility, diversity, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], 03 Salud y bienestar, Psychology, Humans, Psicología del desarrollo, reproducibility, Cognitive and computational psychology, globalization
applicability, developmental science, 150, Psychology, Developmental, 501, Biobehavioral Sciences, 03 Good health and well-being, Psicología, Psicologia - Investigaciones, 004, applicability; developmental science; diversity; globalization; reproducibility, diversity, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], 03 Salud y bienestar, Psychology, Humans, Psicología del desarrollo, reproducibility, Cognitive and computational psychology, globalization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
