
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1025
pmid: 29578289
Premise of the StudyThe evolution of multiple floral traits often underlies the transition from outcrossing to selfing. Such traits can influence the ability to self, and the timing at which selfing occurs, which in turn affects the costs of selfing. Species that display variation in autonomous selfing provide an opportunity to dissect the phenotypic changes that contribute to variability in the mating system.MethodsIn a common garden, we measured dichogamy and herkogamy in 24 populations of the protandrous mixed‐mating herb Campanula americana, and related these to autonomous fruit set (autonomy). We then measured the timing of self‐pollen deposition and fruit production in populations with high and low autonomy, and determined whether pollen germinability across floral development contributes to variation in autonomy.Key ResultsPopulations that transitioned more rapidly to female phase displayed elevated autonomous selfing, but herkogamy was unassociated with autonomous selfing. Selfing occurred more rapidly in highly autonomous populations because of greater self‐pollen deposition early in female phase. Pollen germinability in low‐autonomy populations remained constant across floral development, but in high‐autonomy populations it increased after floral anthesis and was highest near the onset of female phase.ConclusionsReduced dichogamy, elevated self‐pollen deposition, and higher pollen germination late in male phase contribute to both earlier selfing and greater selfing. These traits vary among populations, likely reflecting past selection on the mating system. While delayed selfing bears fewer fitness costs, the evolution of earlier selfing may be favored if self‐pollen availability decreases over floral development.
Time Factors, Pollen, Hermaphroditic Organisms, Campanulaceae, Flowers, Self-Fertilization, Pollination
Time Factors, Pollen, Hermaphroditic Organisms, Campanulaceae, Flowers, Self-Fertilization, Pollination
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
