Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Agronomy Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Agronomy Journal
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Lodging resistance increased by varying the distance between adjacent maize rows

Authors: Bingqin Qi; Buyi Ma; Jun Xue; Bixia Li; Jing Hu; Wangfeng Zhang; Ling Gou;

Lodging resistance increased by varying the distance between adjacent maize rows

Abstract

AbstractHigh planting density of maize (Zea mays L.) changes the distribution of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the canopy and reduces the stalk quality, thus increasing the risk of lodging. The light distribution in the canopy can be changed by changing the row spacing between adjacent row, which in turn may affect lodging resistance. Two maize cultivars, Zhongdan 909 and Xinyu 41 were planted in 60 cm (CK) and three configurations that had different distances between the rows. These treatment were 70 + 50 cm where rows 1 and 2 were separated by 50 cm and rows 2 and 3 were separated by 70 cm. The other treatments were 80 + 40 and 90 + 30 cm. All rows had an equal number of plants. In these plots, canopy light distribution and stalk lodging resistance was measured. The results showed that the intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR) of the whole canopy in the 70 + 50 and 80 + 40 cm did not differ from the CK, but the IPAR from ear level to halfway below the ear level and the soil (H3–H2) increased by 12.5 and 20.1%, compared with the CK. Basal internode cellulose and lignin contents, rind puncture strength (RPS) increased, and lodging rate decreased by 2.8 and 4.5% in the 70 + 50‐ and 80 + 40‐cm treatments compared to the CK. Intercepted PAR in the 90 + 30‐cm treatment decreased, as did its cellulose contents, and RPS, while lodging increased. Therefore, the 70 + 50‐ and 80 + 40‐cm treatments could increased IPAR in the H3–H2 layer, then cause the increase of the cellulose content in the basal internode and lodging resistance.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!