
doi: 10.1002/agj2.20469
AbstractEven though research shows that aggregate stability and mean weight diameter (MWD) are critical components of soil health, it is not routinely measured. An alternative approach to the physical measurement is to calculate these values based on routinely measured soil parameters. Therefore, the objective was to compare two artificial intelligence (AI)‐based machine learning approaches, that is, support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) models in prediction of soil wet aggregate stability (quantified by MWD). Soil samples (120) from the Indo‐Gangetic Alluvium major soil group, that are characterized as Ustifluvents were used in the study. These samples were analyzed for sand, silt, clay, bulk density (BD), organic carbon (OC), and MWD. The correlation coefficient (r) was highest in case of SVM model with a percentage increase of 16.92 and 2.70 when compared with MLR and ANN respectively. The SVM and ANN models showed 6.36 and 2.12% decrease in RMSE in training dataset while a 14.28% decrease was found for SVM in testing dataset when compared to the multi‐linear regression (MLR) model. Results showed that ANN with two neurons (building blocks of ANN) in hidden layer had better performance in predicting MWD than MLR, whereas the radial basis Kernel function based SVM was found to be best for training and testing data of MWD. Soil texture, OC, and BD can be used to predict soil structural stability effectively using SVM. However, additional work is needed to confirm these findings with other soils.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
