
doi: 10.1002/acs.781
AbstractThis paper addresses the problem of fault tolerant estimation and the design of fault tolerant sensor networks. Fault tolerance is defined with respect to a given estimation objective, namely a given functional of the system state should remain observable when sensor failures occur. Redundant and minimal sensor sets are defined and organized into an automaton which contains all the subsets of sensors such that the estimation objective can be achieved. Three criteria, which evaluate the system fault tolerance with respect to sensor failures when a reconfiguration strategy is used, are introduced: (strong and weak) redundancy degrees (RD), sensor network reliability (R), and mean time to non‐observability (MTTNO). Sensor networks are designed by finding redundant sensor sets whose RD and/or R and/or MTTNO are larger than some specified values. A ship boiler example is developed for illustration. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
reliability, [SPI.AUTO] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Automatic, Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.), Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research, reconfiguration, fault tolerant estimation, redundancy, sensor network design
reliability, [SPI.AUTO] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Automatic, Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.), Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research, reconfiguration, fault tolerant estimation, redundancy, sensor network design
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 72 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
