
ABSTRACT For decades, empathy has been hypothesized as a protective factor against bullying. However, this hypothesis is mainly supported by cross‐sectional studies, while longitudinal research on bullying and empathy is still scarce. The present study aimed to fill this gap by conducting random‐intercept cross‐lagged panel models of the relations between cognitive and affective empathy and bullying behaviors across three‐time points each separated by 5 months, separately for boys and girls. Results from 1228 elementary school students (52.92% boys; M age = 10.19, SD = 1.13) indicated that the associations between bullying and empathy are different for boys and girls. For boys, cognitive and affective empathy are negatively associated with bullying at the between level. At the within level, the only significant cross‐lagged path indicated that a positive deviation from the expected score of cognitive empathy at baseline predicted a positive deviation from the expected score in bullying behavior 5 months later. For girls, there were no associations between empathy and bullying at either the within‐ or between‐level. This study calls for further clarification of the direction of the relation between bullying and empathy before incorporating it into prevention programs.
Male, longitudinal, Bullying, Child Behavior, Social Development, random intercept cross‐lagged panel, Sex Factors, bullying, cognitive empathy, Humans, Female, affective empathy, Longitudinal Studies, Empathy, Child, Students, Research Article
Male, longitudinal, Bullying, Child Behavior, Social Development, random intercept cross‐lagged panel, Sex Factors, bullying, cognitive empathy, Humans, Female, affective empathy, Longitudinal Studies, Empathy, Child, Students, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
