Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Complexity Modeling of the Motion Compensation Process of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard

Authors: Mehdi Semsarzadeh; Mohsen Jamali Langroodi; Mahmoud Reza Hashemi; Shervin Shirmohammadi;

Complexity Modeling of the Motion Compensation Process of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard

Abstract

With recent advances in computing and communication technologies, ubiquitous access to high quality multimedia content such as high definition video using smart phones, Net books, or tablets is a fact of our daily life. However, power is still a major concern for any mobile device, and requires optimization of power consumption using a power model for each multimedia application, such as a video decoder. In this paper, a generic decoding complexity model for the motion compensation (MC) process, which constitutes up to 25% of the computational complexity and hence power consumption of an H.264/AVC decoder, has been proposed. For the model to remain independent from a specific implementation or platform, it has been developed by analysing the MC algorithm as described in the standard. Simulation results indicate that the proposed model estimates MC complexity with an average accuracy of 95.63%, for a wide range of test sequences using both JM and x.264 software implementations of H.264/AVC. For a dedicated hardware implementation of the MC module the modeling accuracy is around 89.61%, according to our simulation results. It should be noted that in addition to power consumption control, the proposed model can be used for designing a receiver-aware H.264/AVC encoder, where the complexity constraints of the receiver side are taken into account during compression.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!