
handle: 10630/39335
This paper explores the trade-offs between four different aspects of European workers’ life satisfaction (satisfaction with education, the present work, family life and social life), to reach balanced optimal levels across these features. This analysis was performed separately for different profiles of workers, i.e. full-time and part-time workers in 34 different European countries, differentiated by gender. The methodology employed for this purpose couples econometric and multiobjective interval programming approaches, enabling to assess the compromises of specific aspects of workers’ personal and working conditions. Our findings indicate that current full-time working environments do not enable to foster higher levels of workers’ life satisfaction with more than one child. Moreover, full-time (unlike part-time) working activities allow reaching worse levels across all measures of life satisfaction under analysis in a best-case scenario. This outcome suggests a change of paradigm where workers are keen on sacrificing other aspects of life satisfaction (namely their earnings and benefits) if this means having a better compromise of their personal and working lives. It is clear that promoting one-sided policies that only account for workers’ satisfaction with their jobs and careers, without explicitly encompassing family values, affects fertility rates and population ageing, raising awareness of the importance of family work in policy-making.
https://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk/id/publication/35764
Full-time workers, Satisfacción en el trabajo - Países de la Unión Europea, Workers’ life satisfaction, Part-time workers, Econometric analysis, Empleo - Modelos econométricos, Multiobjective interval programming, Empleo a tiempo parcial
Full-time workers, Satisfacción en el trabajo - Países de la Unión Europea, Workers’ life satisfaction, Part-time workers, Econometric analysis, Empleo - Modelos econométricos, Multiobjective interval programming, Empleo a tiempo parcial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
