
doi: 10.1002/mde.4003
handle: 11353/10.2041787
AbstractThis paper studies the behavioral responses of employees who are endowed with empathic abilities to different institutional designs of incentive pay. Empathic abilities motivate altruistic behavior by sensing the other's feelings toward oneself. In performance contests, empathic individuals withhold effort, most (less) strongly when facing a non‐empathic (empathic) contestant. Effort levels of both non‐empathic and empathic individuals increase with a higher probability that the contestant is of their own type. By developing a theoretical model, our analysis contributes to understanding observed individual behavior in experiments and corresponding econometric evidence. With direct merit pay, effort choices only depend on the signaling quality of the performance measure. Individuals with stronger empathic abilities may shy away from performance contests to, instead, receive merit pay. If gender governs empathic abilities, setting incentives by performance contests cannot simultaneously ensure equal pay and equal opportunities.
502026 Human resource management, Competition, Strategy and Management, 502026 Personalmanagement, Gap, Tournaments, Management Science and Operations Research, Altruism, Gender-differences, Affirmative-action, Management of Technology and Innovation, Preferences, Incentives, Pressure, Women, Business and International Management
502026 Human resource management, Competition, Strategy and Management, 502026 Personalmanagement, Gap, Tournaments, Management Science and Operations Research, Altruism, Gender-differences, Affirmative-action, Management of Technology and Innovation, Preferences, Incentives, Pressure, Women, Business and International Management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
