
doi: 10.18454/rulb.7.25
The article is devoted to the problem of cognitive bases for metonymy. Metonymy belongs to stylistic devices widely used in the language. There are a lot of papers written on metonymy as a stylistic device. Most of them take the traditional linguistic point of view. But it does not help to answer some other deeper questions concerning the nature and cognitive mechanisms of metonymy, which can be default and stylistically marked. In order to disclose the true nature of this language phenomenon we can apply the cognitive notions of concept, conceptualization, metonymic relationships, idealized cognitive model.
стилистическое средство, метонимические отношения, когнитивная лингвистика, концептуализация, metonymic relationships, метонимия, idealized cognitive model, conceptual linguistics, регулярная метонимия, идеализированная когнитивная модель, metonymy, conceptualization
стилистическое средство, метонимические отношения, когнитивная лингвистика, концептуализация, metonymic relationships, метонимия, idealized cognitive model, conceptual linguistics, регулярная метонимия, идеализированная когнитивная модель, metonymy, conceptualization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
