
PURPOSE Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (NIVO1+IPI3) is approved for first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma in several countries. We conducted a phase IIIb/IV study (CheckMate 511) to determine if nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (NIVO3+IPI1) improves the safety profile of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (N = 360) age 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to NIVO3+IPI1 or NIVO1+IPI3 once every 3 weeks for four doses. After 6 weeks, all patients received NIVO 480 mg once every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was a comparison of the incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs) between groups. Secondary end points included descriptive analyses of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study was not designed to formally demonstrate noninferiority of NIVO3+IPI1 to NIVO1+IPI3 for efficacy end points. RESULTS At a minimum follow-up of 12 months, incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 AEs was 34% with NIVO3+IPI1 versus 48% with NIVO1+IPI3 ( P = .006). In descriptive analyses, objective response rate was 45.6% in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 50.6% in the NIVO1+IPI3 group, with complete responses in 15.0% and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the NIVO3+IPI1 group and 8.9 months in the NIVO1+IPI3 group. Median overall survival was not reached in either group. CONCLUSION The CheckMate 511 study met its primary end point, demonstrating a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3-5 AEs with NIVO3+IPI1 versus NIVO1+IPI3. Descriptive analyses showed that there were no meaningful differences between the groups for any efficacy end point, although longer follow up may help to better characterize efficacy outcomes.
Adult, Male, Skin Neoplasms, Time Factors, Medizin, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Administration Schedule, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage, Double-Blind Method, Immunological/administration & dosage, Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, 80 and over, Humans, Melanoma/drug therapy, Ipilimumab/administration & dosage, Melanoma, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage, Middle Aged, Ipilimumab, Progression-Free Survival, Nivolumab/administration & dosage, Nivolumab, Disease Progression, Female, Rapid Communication
Adult, Male, Skin Neoplasms, Time Factors, Medizin, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Administration Schedule, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage, Double-Blind Method, Immunological/administration & dosage, Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, 80 and over, Humans, Melanoma/drug therapy, Ipilimumab/administration & dosage, Melanoma, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage, Middle Aged, Ipilimumab, Progression-Free Survival, Nivolumab/administration & dosage, Nivolumab, Disease Progression, Female, Rapid Communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 269 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
