
handle: 10722/89015
The user of a Geographical Information System is not limited to conventional spatial selections and joins, but may also pose more complicated and descriptive queries. In this paper, we focus on the efficient processing and optimization of complex spatial queries that involve combinations of spatial selections and joins. Our contribution is manifold; we first provide formulae that accurately estimate the selectivity of such queries. These formulae, paired with cost models for selections and joins can be used to combine spatial operators in an optimal way. Second, we propose algorithms that process spatial joins and selections simultaneously and are typically more efficient than combinations of simple operators. Finally we study the problem of optimizing complex spatial queries using these operators, by providing (i) cost models, and (ii) rules that reduce the optimization space significantly. The accuracy of the selectivity models and the efficiency of the proposed algorithms are evaluated through experimentation.
Spatial query processing, 006, Query optimization, Spatial joins
Spatial query processing, 006, Query optimization, Spatial joins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
