
arXiv: 2302.13807
Abstract We prove the central limit theorem (CLT), the first-order Edgeworth expansion and a mixing local central limit theorem (MLCLT) for Birkhoff sums of a class of unbounded heavily oscillating observables over a family of full-branch piecewise $C^2$ expanding maps of the interval. As a corollary, we obtain the corresponding results for Boolean-type transformations on $\mathbb {R}$ . The class of observables in the CLT and the MLCLT on $\mathbb {R}$ include the real part, the imaginary part and the absolute value of the Riemann zeta function. Thus obtained CLT and MLCLT for the Riemann zeta function are in the spirit of the results of Lifschitz & Weber [Sampling the Lindelöf hypothesis with the Cauchy random walk. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 98 (2009), 241–270] and Steuding [Sampling the Lindelöf hypothesis with an ergodic transformation. RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu B34 (2012), 361–381] who have proven the strong law of large numbers for sampling the Lindelöf hypothesis .
central limit theorem, unbounded observable expanding interval maps, dynamical systems (math.DS), number theory (math.NT), Dynamical Systems (math.DS), Lindel¨of hypothesis, Dynamical Systems, 510, quasicompact transfer operators, Edgeworth expansion, Keller-Liverani perturbation theory, mixing local limit theorem, Number Theory, FOS: Mathematics, Riemann zeta functions, Number Theory (math.NT), ergodic limit theorems, 37A50, 60F05, 37A44, 11M06
central limit theorem, unbounded observable expanding interval maps, dynamical systems (math.DS), number theory (math.NT), Dynamical Systems (math.DS), Lindel¨of hypothesis, Dynamical Systems, 510, quasicompact transfer operators, Edgeworth expansion, Keller-Liverani perturbation theory, mixing local limit theorem, Number Theory, FOS: Mathematics, Riemann zeta functions, Number Theory (math.NT), ergodic limit theorems, 37A50, 60F05, 37A44, 11M06
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
