Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1002/cpe.3104
handle: 20.500.12761/1186 , 10016/21481
SUMMARYWe consider Internet‐based master–worker task computations, such as SETI@home, where a master process sends tasks, across the Internet, to worker processes; workers execute and report back some result. However, these workers are not trustworthy, and it might be at their best interest to report incorrect results. In such master–worker computations, the behavior and the best interest of the workers might change over time. We model such computations using evolutionary dynamics, and we study the conditions under which the master can reliably obtain task results. In particular, we develop and analyze an algorithmic mechanism based on reinforcement learning to provide workers with the necessary incentives to eventually become truthful. Our analysis identifies the conditions under which truthful behavior can be ensured and bounds the expected convergence time to that behavior. The analysis is complemented with illustrative simulations. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Performing tasks, Internet, reinforcement learning, Matemáticas, Convergence time, Internet-based computing, performing tasks, Dynamics, Mechanism-based, Internet based computing, Reinforcement learning, Internet based, Machine design, evolutionary dynamics, algorithmic mechanism design, Evolutionary dynamics, Computer applications, Algorithms, Algorithmic mechanism design, Dynamics of evolution
Performing tasks, Internet, reinforcement learning, Matemáticas, Convergence time, Internet-based computing, performing tasks, Dynamics, Mechanism-based, Internet based computing, Reinforcement learning, Internet based, Machine design, evolutionary dynamics, algorithmic mechanism design, Evolutionary dynamics, Computer applications, Algorithms, Algorithmic mechanism design, Dynamics of evolution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 32 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts