
arXiv: math/0111213
handle: 21.11116/0000-0004-3177-F
In 1934, Whitney raised the question of how to recognize whether a function f defined on a closed subset X of Euclidean space is the restriction of a function that is continuously differentiable to order p. A necessary and sufficient criterion was given in the case n=1 by Whitney, using limits of finite differences, and in the case p=1 by Glaeser (1958), using limits of secants. We introduce a necessary geometric criterion, for general n and p, involving limits of finite differences, that we conjecture is sufficient at least if X has a "tame topology". We prove that, if X is a compact subanalytic set, then there exists q=q(p) such that the criterion of order q implies that f is p times continuously differentiable. The result gives a new approach to higher-order tangent bundles (or bundles of differentiable operators) on singular spaces.
AMS-TEX, 28 pages
finite difference, tangent bundle, subanalytic sets, differentiable function, closed subset, Mathematics - Algebraic Geometry, parantangent bundle, Differentiable maps on manifolds, differential operator, FOS: Mathematics, Semi-analytic sets, subanalytic sets, and generalizations, 58C25, 32B20, Differentiable functions on analytic spaces, differentiable spaces, Algebraic Geometry (math.AG), extension of differentiable functions
finite difference, tangent bundle, subanalytic sets, differentiable function, closed subset, Mathematics - Algebraic Geometry, parantangent bundle, Differentiable maps on manifolds, differential operator, FOS: Mathematics, Semi-analytic sets, subanalytic sets, and generalizations, 58C25, 32B20, Differentiable functions on analytic spaces, differentiable spaces, Algebraic Geometry (math.AG), extension of differentiable functions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
