
doi: 10.18454/rulb.7.39
The given article represents the verification method of the results of mega-concept “creation” modeling, which is based on comparison of the cognitive research results with metapoetic statements of D.A.Prigov. The components of the examined mega-concept such as the concept “creator” and “the result of creation”, as well as the concept-frame “the process of creation” were considered step by step. As a result, justification of the chosen cognitive research methods was obtained: they allow to get valuable and rather accurate information about individual poetic consciousness.
metapoetic text, индивидуальное поэтическое сознание, individual poetic consciousness, верификация, мегаконцепт «творчество», концепт, cognitive research, когнитивное исследование, метапоэтический текст, verification, mega-concept “creation”, concept
metapoetic text, индивидуальное поэтическое сознание, individual poetic consciousness, верификация, мегаконцепт «творчество», концепт, cognitive research, когнитивное исследование, метапоэтический текст, verification, mega-concept “creation”, concept
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
