
AbstractMarine debris is known for its ubiquitousness and harmful effects on marine life. This study is the first analysis to provide information on the distribution of floating marine debris in German waters using aerial survey data collected between 2002 and 2016. During regular harbour porpoise monitoring flights, 191,167 km were covered and 26,512 floating debris items recorded (average encounter rate 0.1387 items/km). Debris was encountered more often in the North Sea than in the Baltic Sea (0.16 items/km; 0.08 items/km). The average encounter rate was higher in offshore waters than in coastal areas. Overlaps of marine debris distribution with ‘Special Areas of Conservation’ are a particular reason for concern. Moreover, the spring months (March–May) were identified to be the time of the year with the highest average encounter rates for marine debris. Fishing-related debris was shown to contribute up to 25% of the total number of all observed items. This study shows that opportunistically collected data on marine debris from aerial surveys are valuable for identifying distribution patterns of floating debris without additional survey effort and costs. These data can be used as baseline information to inform management schemes such as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
Waste Products, Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH] ; Waste Products/analysis [MeSH] ; Aerial surveys ; Marine pollution ; Offshore and coastal waters ; Monitoring ; North Sea [MeSH] ; Research Article ; Environmental Monitoring [MeSH] ; Plastics [MeSH] ; Nature conservation, Surveys and Questionnaires, North Sea, Plastics, Research Article, Environmental Monitoring
Waste Products, Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH] ; Waste Products/analysis [MeSH] ; Aerial surveys ; Marine pollution ; Offshore and coastal waters ; Monitoring ; North Sea [MeSH] ; Research Article ; Environmental Monitoring [MeSH] ; Plastics [MeSH] ; Nature conservation, Surveys and Questionnaires, North Sea, Plastics, Research Article, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
