During the last two decades, a small set of distributed computing models for networks have emerged, among which LOCAL, CONGEST, and Broadcast Congested Clique (BCC) play a prominent role. We consider hybrid models resulting from combining these three models. That is, we analyze the computing power of models allowing to, say, perform a constant number of rounds of CONGEST, then a constant number of rounds of LOCAL, then a constant number of rounds of BCC, possibly repeating this figure a constant number of times. We specifically focus on 2-round models, and we establish the complete picture of the relative powers of these models. That is, for every pair of such models, we determine whether one is (strictly) stronger than the other, or whether the two models are incomparable. The separation results are obtained by approaching communication complexity through an original angle, which may be of independent interest. The two players are not bounded to compute the value of a binary function, but the combined outputs of the two players are constrained by this value. In particular, we introduce the XOR-Index problem, in which Alice is given a binary vector $x\in\{0,1\}^n$ together with an index $i\in[n]$, Bob is given a binary vector $y\in\{0,1\}^n$ together with an index $j\in[n]$, and, after a single round of 2-way communication, Alice must output a boolean $\textrm{out}_A$, and Bob must output a boolean $\textrm{out}_B$, such that $\mbox{out}_A\land\mbox{out}_B = x_j\oplus y_i$. We show that the communication complexity of XOR-Index is $Ω(n)$ bits.