
Abstract Purpose Investigate reproducibility of two segmentation methods for multicompartment dosimetry, including normal tissue absorbed dose (NTAD) and tumour absorbed dose (TAD), in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres. Methods TARGET was a retrospective investigation in 209 patients with < 10 tumours per lobe and at least one tumour ≥ 3 cm ± portal vein thrombosis. Dosimetry was compared using two distinct segmentation methods: anatomic (CT/MRI-based) and count threshold-based on pre-procedural 99mTc-MAA SPECT. In a round robin substudy in 20 patients with ≤ 5 unilobar tumours, the inter-observer reproducibility of eight reviewers was evaluated by computing reproducibility coefficient (RDC) of volume and absorbed dose for whole liver, whole liver normal tissue, perfused normal tissue, perfused liver, total perfused tumour, and target lesion. Intra-observer reproducibility was based on second assessments in 10 patients ≥ 2 weeks later. Results 99mTc-MAA segmentation calculated higher absorbed doses compared to anatomic segmentation (n = 209), 43.9% higher for TAD (95% limits of agreement [LoA]: − 49.0%, 306.2%) and 21.3% for NTAD (95% LoA: − 67.6%, 354.0%). For the round robin substudy (n = 20), inter-observer reproducibility was better for anatomic (RDC range: 1.17 to 3.53) than 99mTc-MAA SPECT segmentation (1.29 to 7.00) and similar between anatomic imaging modalities (CT: 1.09 to 3.56; MRI: 1.24 to 3.50). Inter-observer reproducibility was better for larger volumes. Perfused normal tissue volume RDC was 1.95 by anatomic and 3.19 by 99mTc-MAA SPECT, with corresponding absorbed dose RDC 1.46 and 1.75. Total perfused tumour volume RDC was higher, 2.92 for anatomic and 7.0 by 99mTc-MAA SPECT with corresponding absorbed dose RDC of 1.84 and 2.78. Intra-observer variability was lower for perfused NTAD (range: 14.3 to 19.7 Gy) than total perfused TAD (range: 42.8 to 121.4 Gy). Conclusion Anatomic segmentation-based dosimetry, versus 99mTc-MAA segmentation, results in lower absorbed doses with superior reproducibility. Higher volume compartments, such as normal tissue versus tumour, exhibit improved reproducibility. Trial registration: NCT03295006.
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Yttrium-90, Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy; Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging; Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy; Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy; Retrospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use; Microspheres; Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects; Dosimetry; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radioembolization; Yttrium-90, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver Neoplasms, Medizin, Reproducibility of Results, Embolization, Therapeutic, Microspheres, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Dosimetry, Humans, Original Article, Yttrium Radioisotopes, Radioembolization, Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin, Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Yttrium-90, Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy; Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging; Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy; Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy; Retrospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use; Microspheres; Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects; Dosimetry; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radioembolization; Yttrium-90, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver Neoplasms, Medizin, Reproducibility of Results, Embolization, Therapeutic, Microspheres, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Dosimetry, Humans, Original Article, Yttrium Radioisotopes, Radioembolization, Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
