Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Planta Daninhaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Planta Daninha
Article . 2012
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

Períodos de dessecação de Urochloa ruziziensis e seu reflexo na produtividade da soja RR Burn-down timing of Urochloa ruziziensis and its effect on RR soybean yield

Authors: M.P. Nepomuceno; R.M. Varela; P.L.C.A. Alves; J.V.F. Martins;

Períodos de dessecação de Urochloa ruziziensis e seu reflexo na produtividade da soja RR Burn-down timing of Urochloa ruziziensis and its effect on RR soybean yield

Abstract

Com o objetivo de avaliar os efeitos de períodos de dessecação de Urochloa ruziziensis na implantação e na produtividade da soja transgênica no sistema de plantio direto, foram conduzidos dois experimentos em campo, nos municípios de Colina-SP, no ano agrícola de 2007/08, e Jaboticabal-SP, em 2009/10. Em Colina, utilizou-se uma área de pastagem de U. ruziziensis, conduzida há sete anos. Nesse local foram testados quatro períodos de dessecação da cobertura vegetal: 30, 20, 10 e 0 dias antes da semeadura da soja. No experimento de Jaboticabal, a área utilizada tinha histórico de pastagem com U. ruziziensis, que no ano agrícola 2008/09 foi cultivada com milho. Após a colheita do milho ocorreu reinfestação natural de U. ruziziensis na área, correspondendo a mais de 80% de cobertura vegetal. Nesse experimento, os tratamentos corresponderam a seis períodos de dessecação: 25, 20, 16, 12, 7 e 0 dias após a aplicação. Nos dois experimentos utilizou-se 1,44 kg e.a. ha-1 do herbicida glyphosate e o cultivar de soja M-SOY 7908 RR. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. Foram avaliados o estande da cultura aos 20 dias após a semeadura da soja e na pré-colheita, a altura de plantas, a altura de inserção da primeira vagem, o número de vagens por planta e o rendimento de grãos (produtividade estimada em kg ha-1). Os resultados foram submetidos à análise de variância (teste F), com as médias sendo comparadas pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade. A dessecação de U. ruziziensis no mesmo dia da semeadura da soja reduziu a altura das plantas, o número de vagens por planta e a produtividade de grãos. O período recomendado para o manejo químico de U. ruziziensis com glyphosate está entre 10 e 20 dias antes da semeadura da soja. Pôde-se concluir que o período de dessecação de U. ruziziensis alterou a produtividade da cultura.Two field trials were carried out to evaluate the effects of burn-down timing of Urochloa ruziziensis on transgenic soybean establishment and yield under the no-tillage system. One experiment was conducted in Colina, SP - Brazil, in 2007/2008 season, and the other in Jaboticabal, SP - Brazil, 2009/2010 season. In 2007/2008, the experiment was carried out in a 7-year-old grass pasture of U. ruziziensis, with four burn-down timings of vegetation cover being tested 30, 20, 10, and 0 days in advance to soybean sowing. In 2009/2010, the experiment was conducted in an old grass pasture of U. ruziziensis cropped with maize the summer before. After maize harvesting, a natural re-infestation of U. ruziziensis occurred, corresponding to more than 80% of the vegetation cover. In this experiment, treatments corresponded to six burn-down timings of vegetation cover 25, 20, 16, 7, and 0 days in advance to soybean sowing. In all experiments, 1.44 kg a.e. ha-1 of herbicide glyphosate was applied, and the soybean cultivar M-SOY 7908 RR was used. The experiments were arranged in a randomized block design, with four replicates. The evaluations were carried out by measuring crop stand 20 days after sowing and pre-harvest, plant height, first pod insertion height, number of pods per plant, grain yield, and estimated yield. Data were submitted to ANOVA and the Tukey test at 5% of probability. Burn-down of U. ruziziensis performed at the same day of crop sowing reduced plant height, number of pods per plant, and crop grain yield. Burn-down timing of U. ruziziensis using glyphosate was recommended to be between 10 and 20 days in advance to crop sowing. In conclusion, soybean yield was affected by burn-down timing of U. ruziziensis.

Keywords

Glycine max, cobertura vegetal, QH301-705.5, Botany, vegetation cover, alelopatia, Brachiaria ruziziensis, glyphosate, QK1-989, allelopathy, Biology (General)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold