Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Word to word transcripts of 11 semi-structured interviews carried out during the period April-October 2020 on 'What do FNS-Cloud Food Researchers Want to Know'. The notes were independently taken by the two interviewers during the interviews and combined to produce almost word-to-word transcripts of the interviews. Included in this Excel are also the questions addressed. The semi-guided interviews were undertaken to ensure the content validity of trainings for the FNS-Cloud community, and to reflect the training needs and preferences of FNS-Cloud project partners. Both interviewers (2 persons) and interviewed (15 persons) were food science professionals participating in the FNS-Cloud project (H2020 No. 863059). The Interviews, which lasted 30 minutes, aimed at identifying training needs and preferences related to open science and the use of the project datasets, tools and services: what partners want to learn, how they prefer to learn, and who are their ideal teachers. Inductive coding of the transcripts was done with the NVivo 12 Pro© software for qualitative analysis, following an iterative approach involving three researchers reviewing interview transcripts, codes, sub-codes, and coded phrases. The results of the qualitative analysis are presented in the paper: Teaching Open Science. What do FNS-Cloud Food Researchers Want to Know? presented at the 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22), HEAd'22 | June 14-17, 2022 · Valencia, Spain (headconf.org) and published as a Peer-reviewed article in the: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22) (includes DOI and ISBN)
FNS-Cloud; training; open science; course development; lifelong learning
FNS-Cloud; training; open science; course development; lifelong learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 57 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts