{"references": ["1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.", "2. Banks, J. A. (2015). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies. Teachers College Press.", "3. Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (Eds.). (2013). Teaching history for the common good. Routledge.", "4. Berliner, D. C. (1987). Ways of thinking about students and classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(9), 682-686.", "5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.", "6. Cavanaugh, C., & Clark, T. (2007). The landscape of K-12 online learning. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 115-130). Routledge.", "7. Chandler, T. (2014). Education and the culture of democracy: Early childhood to secondary. Routledge.", "8. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of educational research, 76(1), 1-62.", "9. Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 51-76). Springer Netherlands.", "10. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Simon and Schuster.", "11. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books.", "12. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.", "13. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266.", "14. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.", "15. Lee, J., Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Exploring factors affecting high school students' motivation in history learning: A qualitative approach. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 1-15.", "16. Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N. L., & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(2), 49-69.", "17. National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. National Council for the Social Studies.", "18. NE'MATOV, OZODBEK., ZARINA, R., & MAFTUNA, K. HISTORICAL PLACES OF THE FARISH DISTRICT."]}

This article explores the evolution of modern methods of teaching history in the classroom. With a focus on using innovative approaches to engage students and enhance their understanding of historical events, this article examines the use of technology, inquiry-based learning, and project-based learning in the teaching of history. The use of technology has revolutionized the way history is taught, with teachers using a wide range of digital tools to make the subject more interesting and interactive. Multimedia resources such as videos, podcasts, and interactive maps have made it easier to present complex historical ideas and concepts in a more engaging and accessible way. Inquiry-based learning has made it possible for students to take a more active role in their learning by asking questions and seeking answers. By using primary and secondary sources, students are able to develop their research skills and learn how to evaluate different sources of information critically. Project-based learning has also proven to be effective in teaching history, as it allows students to work collaboratively on projects that require them to apply historical knowledge to real-world situations. This approach promotes creativity, teamwork, and problem-solving skills, and allows students to develop a deeper understanding of historical events by applying them to contemporary issues. However, traditional methods of teaching history still have their place in the classroom, and should not be completely replaced by modern approaches. Lectures, readings, and discussions are still important in providing students with a solid foundation of historical knowledge and understanding. Moreover, traditional methods can be combined with modern approaches to create a more well-rounded and effective learning experience for students.