Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Life-Cycle Assessment of an Airborne Wind Energy System

Authors: Petrick, Kristian;

Life-Cycle Assessment of an Airborne Wind Energy System

Abstract

Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) technology provides an interesting re-design for energy generation from the wind. The value of renewable energy systems is their ability to generate electricity with reduced environmental impacts, most crucially being the Global Warming Potential. In this project, it is assessed what the impacts of a potential Multi-Megawatt AWE system would be. Firstly to determine where its impact hot-spots are located and secondly to assess how this new technology would compare to conventional wind energy systems operating in the same farm. The location of the farm is included as a sensitivity parameter to assess the advantages and disadvantages of both systems for operation in various locations under different environmental conditions. The technologies were assessed and compared using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The LCA is used to assess the systems for their Global Warming Potentials (GWP) and their Cumulative Energy Demands (CED). The CED is subsequently also used to determine the Energy Payback Time (EPBT) and the Energy Return of Investment (EROI) of both systems. The assessment of the impacts was performed on models that first had to be designed. The many unknowns and variables in both designs meant that modelling accounted for a large fraction of the project. The AWE system is modelled as a Ground-Gen, Rigid-Wing system based on the design of Ampyx Power. The HAWT system is designed to represent an accurate comparison model for the AWE system. It is fully based on various literature sources, primarily on optimisations of the NREL 5MW. It was found that the impacts of the HAWT system greatly depends on environmental conditions at the location for which it is designed. The AWE system does however only minimally depend on the environmental conditions. Thereby, it can be evaluated where AWE would have the largest advantage over HAWT technology and where HAWT technology may be better. The project is carried out in collaboration with Airborne Wind Europe and Ampyx Power. Data was intended to come from Ampyx Power. However, the project started too early into delayed feasibility studies which limited the availability of design data and even concept plans. The report therefore presents the impacts of a potential future 5 MW system. Modelled to the best ability at this time, with an hydraulic drivetrain and a hub-less drum design. Additional focus is placed on the availability of improvement potentials and assessment of design variables. Thereby aiming to further improve general sustainable knowledge within the AWE sector. The AWE system is found to use significantly less materials and to produce electricity at notably lower impacts compared to the HAWT system. AWE is found to be most advantageous for operation at unfavourable environmental conditions, where the wind speed is low, and the HAWT system requires a large hub-height. The Land and Launch Apparatus (LLA) and the Power Generation Apparatus (PGA) subsystems are found to be the largest impact contributors within the AWE system. The largest impact component is found to be the hydraulic accumulator system in the PGA, primarily due to its large mass. Its high impacts are closely followed by the light weight tether and aircraft subsystems that require materials with high specific impacts.

Keywords

airborne wind energy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 6
  • 6
    views
    6
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
6
Green