Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Matilda: a bibliographic/metric tool for open science

Authors: Torny, Didier;

Matilda: a bibliographic/metric tool for open science

Abstract

The Open Access movement has long insisted on the availability and reusability of academic texts as a goal to achieve knowledge dissemination, without putting specific attention to the question of metadata. The fact that no reference was made to metadata in the main OA declarations (Budapest, Berlin, Bethesda) has led to a paradoxical situation. The more publication as a process became accessible and reusable, the more its content was searched and found through privately-owned and often costly bibliographic/metric tools by research communities. In recent years, the I40C coalition and the I4OA coalition have advocated for the opening of metadata and databases such as OpenAlex and OpenCitations have enabled the sharing of metadata. However, these achievements do not currently meet the needs of researchers for two reasons. On the one hand, they are databases to be used via APIs or dumps and not tools that can be easily appropriated by untrained users. On the other hand, their temporality does not enable services that can be used by those who wish to follow the evolution of the literature on a day-to-day basis. Faced with this lack, Matilda is based on open source software and multiple open data sources, Matilda aims at constituting an open science infrastructure for all research domains which don’t currently have well-designed community-based search & alert services. It currently provides at least four services: an easy-to-use multi-criteria search, citation tracking on texts, authors, multi-criteria, the creation of associated alerts via RSS feeds and of course DOI, HTML and PDF links to enable the reading of texts of interest to researchers, outside the platform. Matilda is currently based on four documentary sources (ArXiv, Crossref, PubMedCenral, RePEc) which continuously feed deduplication/aggregation operations, then metadata enrichment through ORCID and the production of reference links, notably through GROBID. As of September 1st, 2023, it displays 112 million “works” (the aggregation of "identical" documents), 200 million documents and more than 9.2 million authors, with a mean daily update of around 200,000 documents. The current version only relies on metadata, including abstract, reconstructed references and authors identification. The ongoing development will enable full-text search by the end of 2023, making Matilda a real alternative to Google Scholar and commercial databases, especially for citation-tracking services. It will be fully available to researchers from autumn on, for feedback and to better understand how researchers use these search tools, as there is almost no literature on these uses.

Explore Matilda: https://matilda.huma-num.fr/?l=fr

Keywords

Open Access, Metadata, Open source, Open Data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 2
  • 2
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
2
Green