Downloads provided by UsageCountsBBMRI-ERIC User satisfaction survey template
Maike Tauchert; Agnieszka Matera-Witkiewicz; Annelies Debucquoy; Aulikki Santavuori; Cornelia Stumptner; Eva Ortega-Paíno; Florian Hinterberger; +18 Authors
Maike Tauchert; Agnieszka Matera-Witkiewicz; Annelies Debucquoy; Aulikki Santavuori; Cornelia Stumptner; Eva Ortega-Paíno; Florian Hinterberger; Giorgio Stanta; Helmuth Haslacher; Joanna Gleńska-Olender; Joanna Vella; Josephine Uldry; Lou Ferraton; Lovice Sutherland; Małgorzata Witoń; Michał Laskowski; Mieke De Wilde; Nhutuyen Nguyen; Patrycja Gazinska; Peter Riegman; Ronny Baber; Sabrina Schmitt; Stella Antoniou; Teresa Escámez; and WG QMS members of BBMRI-ERIC member (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland) and observer countries (Denmark, Lithuania, Spain, Turkey, Qatar, IARC/WHO);
BBMRI-ERIC User satisfaction survey template
The BBMRI-ERIC user satisfaction survey template is intended to help biobanks to have their services evaluated by their users on a regular basis and to collect feedback regarding future needs for services as well as suggestions for improving biobank processes. In this way, they comply with the requirement to seek feedback, for example, in ISO standards 20387:2018 and ISO 9001:2015. The survey template is the basis for the user survey and must be individually adapted by each biobank before it can be used to assess user satisfaction. To support this process, the document also includes an implementation guide.
- University of Malta Malta
- Medical University of Graz Austria
- Erasmus University Medical Center Netherlands
- Wrocław Medical University Poland
- Leipzig University Germany
Biobanking, Quality Management, Template, User satisfaction survey, Biobank
Biobanking, Quality Management, Template, User satisfaction survey, Biobank
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average views 72 downloads 57 - 72views57downloads
selected citations
Citations provided by BIP!
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP!influenceInfluence provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Influence provided by BIP!impulseImpulse provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
Impulse provided by BIP!viewsViews provided by UsageCounts
Views provided by UsageCountsdownloadsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts 0
Average
Average
Average
72
57
Fields of Science