
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Abstract Introduced dung beetles face numerous challenges when establishing in new environments; one of them being infection by entomopathogenic microorganisms. The microbes associated with insect hosts, collectively termed 'the microbiome', have been shown to be important in susceptibility to entomopathogen infection. In this study, we used a targeted phylogenetic marker gene sequencing approach to investigate the composition of the exoskeletal microbiome of introduced dung beetles in controlled-environment rearing conditions. Swabs from the exoskeletons of 'alive and healthy' dung beetles, and 'diseased and dead' dung beetles of various species were cultured on selective media to isolate the microorganisms. The fungal and bacterial operational taxonomic units were identified by Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing, targeting ITS and 16SrRNA genes in genomic DNA extracted from culture plates. The diversity of fungi and bacteria associated with the exoskeleton of introduced dung beetles differed among the dung beetle species. There was a significant reduction in the microbial diversity among 'diseased and dead' beetles in contrast to 'alive and healthy' beetles. Entomopathogenic fungi associated with exoskeletal microbiomes were more prevalent in 'diseased and dead' beetles. Further investigation into ‘healthy’ and ‘diseased’ microbiomes of dung beetles is warranted to establish the relationship between dung beetle health and their exoskeletal microbiome.
{"references": ["Doube, B. M. (2018). Ecosystem services provided by dung beetles in Australia. Basic and applied ecology, 26, 35-49.", "Edwards, P., Wilson, P. K., & Wright, J. (2015). Introduced dung beetles in Australia: a pocket field guide (Third edition. ed.). CSIRO Publishing.", "Caron, V., P\u00e9rez Vila, S., & Gueidan, C. (2023). Beauveria australis finds a new host in French dung beetles introduced to Australia. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 197, 107889.", "Hong, S., Sun, Y., Chen, H., & Wang, C. (2023). Suppression of the insect cuticular microbiomes by a fungal defensin to facilitate parasite infection. The ISME Journal, 17(1), 1-11.", "Janke, R. S., Kaftan, F., Niehs, S. P., Scherlach, K., Rodrigues, A., Svato\u0161, A., Hertweck, C., Kaltenpoth, M., & Fl\u00f3rez, L. V. (2022). Bacterial ectosymbionts in cuticular organs chemically protect a beetle during molting stages. The ISME Journal, 16(12), 2691-2701.", "Chong, J., Liu, P., Zhou, G., & Xia, J. (2020). Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nature Protocols, 15(3), 799-821"]}
Exoskeletal microbiome, Entomopathogens, Illumina MiSeq, Dung beetles
Exoskeletal microbiome, Entomopathogens, Illumina MiSeq, Dung beetles
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 2 | |
downloads | 1 |