Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Author guidelines in chemistry through the lens of research data sharing

Authors: Nicole A. Parks; Tilmann G. Fischer; Claudia Blankenburg; Vincent F. Scalfani; Leah R. McEwen; Sonja Herres-Pawlis; Steffen Neumann;

Author guidelines in chemistry through the lens of research data sharing

Abstract

NFDI4Chem’s vision is the digitalisation of all key steps in chemical research to support scientists in their efforts to collect, store, process, analyse, publish, and re-use research data [1]. For that goal, we aim at making chemical research data FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) [2]. As the primary method of communicating research results, journals and their author guidelines have a tremendous impact on community behavior. To work with scientific journal editors to enhance recommendations on data publication, we organised the Editors4Chem workshop in 2021 [3]. The 2nd Editors4Chem workshop will be held in the fall of 2023. Additionally, we analysed author guidelines from several publishers and journals active in chemistry research. This poster outlines the results of a large-scale analysis [4] of author guidelines: To which extent is the publishing landscape supporting FAIR Data and Open Science practices? In which areas is this support lacking and what are the underlying reasons? How should authors navigate these changes? [1] C. Steinbeck, O. Koepler, F. Bach, S. Herres-Pawlis, N. Jung, J. Liermann, S. Neumann, et al., Research Ideas and Outcomes, 2020, 6: e55852. DOI: 10.3897/rio.6.e55852. Website: www.nfdi4chem.de. [2] M. Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. da Silva Santos, P. E. Bourne, et al. Sci Data 2016, 3, 160018, DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. [3] T. G. Fischer, 1st Editors4Chem Workshop, www.nfdi4chem.de, 2021, URL: www.nfdi4chem.de/index.php/2021/11/23/1st-editors4chem-workshop/ [4] N. A. Parks, T. G. Fischer, C. Blankenburg, V. F. Scalfani, L. R. McEwen, S. Herres-Pawlis, S. Neumann, Pure Appl. Chem. 2023, ASAP. DOI: 10.1515/pac-2022-1001.

Keywords

author guidelines, research data management, publication standards, chemistry, NFDI4Chem

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
    download downloads 6
  • 9
    views
    6
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
9
6
Green