Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This deliverable provides the first iteration of the Quality Assurance and certification Framework (QAF) for Open Science professional training and qualifications. It offers a reference framework (not a prescriptive requirement) to assure the quality of training materials and resources, based in four sections or sub-frameworks important in the context of Skills4EOSC project’s principles and philosophy: Minimum Viable Skillset, FAIR-by-design and ELSI (Ethical, Legal and Social Issues), in conjunction with a comprehensive evaluation framework and learning resources catalogues. The document is a first approach to establish a set of attributes and useful questions for assessing the training materials created by Skills4EOSC. It also provides a useful reference for analysing the quality of any other Open Science course or educational resource. To come up with the initial QAF this first iteration of the deliverable defined a methodology of analysis for four sub-frameworks with essential elements, best practices and evaluation frameworks, in order to ignite a broader discussion with the stakeholders. This deliverable points out also some proposals for the community-endorsed version of the QAF and challenges for the future work and implementation.
Open Science, Skills, Framework, Training, Qualification, Certification framework, Competences, Quality assurance, FAIR
Open Science, Skills, Framework, Training, Qualification, Certification framework, Competences, Quality assurance, FAIR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 71 | |
| downloads | 57 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts