Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2025
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Software . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Software . 2025
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluating the use of Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy for pollen chemical characterization

Authors: Muthreich, Florian; Tafintseva, Valeria; Zimmermann, Boris; Kohler, Achim; Vila-Viçosa, Carlos; Seddon, Alistair;

Evaluating the use of Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy for pollen chemical characterization

Abstract

Vibrational spectroscopy is gaining popularity for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns in plants, particularly in relation to the analysis of pollen grains. So far, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) has been the main approach used to classify pollen grains based on chemical variations. However, FTIR may be less suitable for detecting differences in the pollen-grain exine, mainly composed of sporopollenin. In contrast, Raman spectroscopy has increased sensitivity for the main chemical components found within sporopollenins. We compare the classification performance and chemical information provided by FTIR and FT-Raman using a large dataset of Quercus L. pollen, comprising 5 species in 3 sections (section Cerris: Q. suber; section Ilex: Q. coccifera, Q. rotundifolia; section Quercus: Q. robur, Q. faginea). We use multiblock sparse partial-least-squares discriminant analyses (MB-SPL-DA) analyses to directly compare the two infrared methods. Both FTIR and FT-Raman successfully classified Quercus pollen to section level (100% accuracy). At the species level our models achieved ~90% accuracy for FT-Rama and FTIR separately and in the combined multiblock model. The multiblock results showed an increased number of sporopollenin peaks observed in FT-Raman spectra as compared to FTIR. These peaks are also of a higher importance for classification. Results also showed differences in the types of vibrations that are of diagnostic value for the two infrared methods. CH2 deformations are more important in FT-Raman, while C-O-C, C-O, and C=O stretches are more important for FTIR-based identification of pollen. These vibrations are indicators of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. FT-Raman provides equally successful diagnostic potential to FTIR, but uses more chemical information based on variations in sporopollenin chemistry than FTIR. We suggest that the combined analysis of FTIR and FT-Raman using multiblock analysis has great potential for classification.

Funding provided by: The Research Council of NorwayROR ID: https://ror.org/00epmv149Award Number: PollChem 249844 Funding provided by: L. Meltzers HøyskolefondROR ID: https://ror.org/02rec2820Award Number: 2017/05/LMH

Keywords

multiblock, Chemistry, Quercus, FTIR, Pollen, Raman, Spectroscopy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities