Downloads provided by UsageCounts
National governments and international donors fund challenge competitions to foster and guide innovation, but there is little evidence on the economic return to such investments in entrepreneurship and R&D. We conduct an ex-ante benefit-cost analysis to project the economic return on the 2023 Fab Bhutan Challenge. On the Challenge benefits side of the analysis, we draw from scientific studies covering five topics: crop yield improvements from climate adaptation (for Challenge 1 in Sarpang, Sarpang), cost and time savings from improved water supply (for Challenge 2 in Pangbisa, Paro), livelihood savings from human-wildlife conflict prevention (Challenge 3 in Lumbukha Chiwong, Punakha), revenue generation from cultural exports (Challenge 4 in Thimphu), and economic returns from special needs education investments (Challenge 5 in Rinchending, Chhukha). On the Challenge cost side, we collected challenge budget data and conducted rapid interviews with participants in the five challenges on expected solution costs. Conservative estimates that account for the probability of some challenge solutions ultimately being non-viable place the economic return to Bhutan between $5 and $12 per dollar spent. We conclude by discussing opportunities and challenges for scaling solutions from the structured innovation challenge based on the global evidence, and implications of the study for Bhutan’s economic aspirations.
benefit-cost analysis, water supply, special education needs, economics, labour productivity, innovation, agriculture, human-wildlife conflict
benefit-cost analysis, water supply, special education needs, economics, labour productivity, innovation, agriculture, human-wildlife conflict
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 30 | |
| downloads | 22 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts