Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This research has been approved by the Ethics Commission of the Faculty of Management, Economics, and Social Sciences of the University of Cologne under reference 200010BI. We thank Clara Bersch, Yulia Litvinova, Ann-Kathrin Blanke, Toan Huynh, Anna Vogts and Matteo Tinè for research assistance, and Iyad Rahwan, Jean-Francois Bonnefon, Aljaz Ule, Anne-Marie Nussberger as well as the attendees of the Cognition, Values & Behaviour Research Group (Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München / LMU Munich), Moral AI lab meeting (Max Planck Institute for Human Development & Toulouse School of Economics), Applied Ethics & Morality Group (Prague University of Business and Economics), Centre for Decision Research (University of Leeds), Department of Economics and Management (University of Pisa), Decision Making and Economic Psychology Center (Ben-Gurion University), Behavioral and Management Science group (Technion), Colloquium of the Department of Social Psychology (Tilburg University) & Seminar at Department of Computer Science (Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg) for their helpful comments. The research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy–EXC 2126/1–390838866' ECONtribute: Markets and Public Policy', the European Research Council (ERC-StG-637915), and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry (IHK) Koblenz.
Package to the following paper: Leib, M; Köbis, N; Rilke, R M; Hagens, M; Irlenbusch, B (2023) Corrupted by Algorithms? How AI-generated and Human-written Advice Shape (Dis)honesty
Behavioural Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Advice, Machine Behaviour
Behavioural Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Advice, Machine Behaviour
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 30 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts