Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lessons learned and best practices in developing an information system for interdisciplinary, heterogeneous, multidimensional environmental data: the WIBE (Water Interdisciplinary Biology and Ecology) information system

Authors: Madon, Bénédicte; David, Romain; Epinoux, Clémence; Pignon-Mussaud, Cécilia; Arnaud, Elie; LeBras, Yvan; Thomas, Hélène;

Lessons learned and best practices in developing an information system for interdisciplinary, heterogeneous, multidimensional environmental data: the WIBE (Water Interdisciplinary Biology and Ecology) information system

Abstract

Research data collected during scientific projects financed by public funds must be reusable not only by the scientific community which produces them, but also by the civil society who finances the projects through taxes. The systematic provision of publicly financed research data is an important condition for the reproducibility of science and the reuse of results and data in the context of other studies. Guiding principles facilitating the sharing and reuse of research data (the FAIR 'Findable Accessible Interoperable Reusable' principles and European initiatives to develop the European Open Science Cloud EOSC) are fostering the conditions of this necessary change at the European scale. It would be tempting to think that the creation of FAIR and open data is a simple, static, and achievable one-step process. Our experience shows that many challenges are paving the way to structure, share and open research data, interdisciplinary. This chapter describes the lessons learned for structuring, sharing, and opening interdisciplinary heterogeneous environmental data from multiple research projects. The WIBE case study involved the curation of biological data (e.g. invertebrate biomarkers), multi-source contextual data (socio-economic data, e.g. port attendance), oceanographic monitoring data (e.g. sea temperature, sea salinity, Chl.a), sea pollution data (e.g. concentration of hydrocarbons). Based on our experience in developing WIBE, an information system respecting the FAIR principles and the “as open as possible as closed as necessary” requirements, this chapter also draws recommendations on developing approval mechanisms for different data producers so that the minimum vocabularies and metadata meet the needs of the entire community and proposes best practices to "create the conditions for reuse" for interdisciplinary data by offering a data architecture enable to welcome data from multidimensional topics, formats and scientific approaches dedicated to marine and freshwater research.

Keywords

interdisciplinarity, FAIR principle, open science, information system, best practices, marine and freshwater research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 40
    download downloads 29
  • 40
    views
    29
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
40
29
Green