Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely acknowledged as a new kind of science that will bring about (and is already enabling) the next technological revolution. Virtually every week, exciting reports come our way about the use of AI for drug discovery, game playing, stock trading and law enforcement. And virtually all of these are mostly concerned with a very narrow technological capability, that of predicting future instances based on past instances. Although it is now recognized that this type of statistical associations is limited in its ability to understand the world and model its knowledge, there is still a lot of criticism and hesitancy about the use of symbolic logic to accomplish or assist in a broader vision for AI. In this article, we look at some of the assumptions held and circulated in social media about logic and point out that there are deep misunderstandings. By arguing that symbolic logic is more flexible than believed by non-experts, we make a case for Neuro-Symbolic AI offering the best of both worlds.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 52 | |
| downloads | 49 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts